As I read Anne Winters, I was reminded of Adrienne Rich’s
essay in which she says that she uses poetry in order to make sense of things.
I can see this idea in Winters’s work, specifically when looking at “The Grass
Grower.” The McHale article was also helpful in looking at the narrative that
is created in this specific poem as far as investigating ways in which Winters
constructs gaps and spaces within the poetic form.
The
poem itself is divided into two sections, and within the space of the two
sections, it is evident that a time lapse has occurred. The speaker begins the narrative
in 1979, after integration and only a few years after Jim Crow Laws were
abolished, but then flashes back to the speakers first encounter with the grass
grower. The overall narrative depicts the evolution of the relationship between
“a skinny white kid” and “a black vet” named Joel Harmon. If the collection of
poems can be viewed as a cohesive whole with one speaker, it is possible to
make the argument that the speaker is Anne herself. However, the first-person
narrator remains unnamed and undescribed, aside from the aforementioned epithet.
By applying McHale’s contributions
to the poetic narrative, I can see how Winters constructs the narrative from
stanza to stanza. In the first stanza Winters creates a snap shot of Joel
Harmon, the grass grower, providing a brief but vivid description of the
subject. As the reader focuses on this image, the speaker shifts back into memory,
imagining him “[as] on that first day.” The reader is propelled forward into
the next stanza and back into time through Winters’s enjambed line formation. This
technique is used continuously through the two-part poem, guiding the reader
not only in and out of time but blurring the lines of the internal and
external.
Spaces are created through the
varied use of internal thought and the external dialogue that occurs between
the speaker and Joel Harmon. Within the dialogue, Winters seems to play with
the concept of time as Harmon recounts his experiences and memories to the speaker,
creating a third person within the narrative, a personified Jim Crow. Recalling
the idea of the initial snapshot, the speaker paints an image as “Line by line
you gave me Jim’s portrait, his subtle subsets.” As the speaker explores these
experiences, she later declares, “So I’d sensed by then, that Jim, and not you,
was the subject.” Harmon is displaced by the fictional image of Jim Crow, the
Jim that “made [him] a grass-widow man here in Harlem.
While narrative is significant in this
particular poem, Winters also does some interesting and worthwhile things with the
concept of language. Joel Harmon is a radio repair man, someone who fixes a
source of sound and words yet “simply conducting, in silence [his] life.”
Through his dialogue, Winters points to the power of words, equating the words
of Jim Crow Laws to the death march of Hitler and Stalin, “liked words.” And I
can’t help but connect the idea of Harmon as a repair man of words, sowing the
seeds of … I’m not quite sure what.
No comments:
Post a Comment